Monday, 9 December 2019
Saturday, 7 December 2019
Wednesday, 4 December 2019
RED RIDING 1974- REVIEW
This is the city. I mean, the shire. I mean, the administrative county. Every two days, there’s a murder; every two hours, an assault; every two seconds, a secretion, a suppuration, an emission, a discharge. That’s where Edward Dunford comes in. He carries a badge. A press badge.
In his novel 1974, David Peace wants West Riding to be James Ellroy’s Los Angeles only more. Or less. More corrupt, more dangerous, more deadly. Crazier, grittier, edgier. And less hygienic. A lot less hygienic. The result is a mama’s stew of pornography, gore-nography and pore-nography that in the end is so OTT as to make you reassess a book that starts out as a decent enough page-turner.
Not least because Peace writes in a punchy style that evokes LA mystery writers while staying true to its time and place. The story is being told by an actual writer--not a cop with literary ambitions, but the newly minted North of England Crime Correspondent for a regional newspaper. Edward Dunford is fresh off his first Page One story and jonesing for more. But it wouldn’t be proper noir if he didn’t have an amoral rival, didn’t run afoul of every form of authority and wasn’t his own worst enemy.
Blessed with the kind of intuition noir protagonists invariably have, Edward senses that the recent disappearance of a ten-year-old girl is tied to two similar murders in the previous five years. His editor wants proof. So do the cops. Edward sets out to find some.
His desultory investigation gets a kick in the right direction when his colleague Barry, an investigative journalist with his nose in the business affairs of local developers, dies in a traffic accident involving a delivery van, sheet glass and decapitation. Suspicious? Apparently only to Edward, who is bequeathed Barry’s horde of incriminating files.
Along the way to solving multiple mysteries, Edward treats everyone and everything very badly: girlfriends, witnesses, colleagues, his mother, his father’s memory, his father’s watch, office equipment, vehicles, home furnishings. He is unable to have a conversation with a woman without it escalating into a knock-down drag-out fight or fuck. Coupled with his inability to keep bodily fluids—spit, snot, piss, pus, cum, blood, sweat, tears--from entering the eco-system and possessed of a two-word potty mouth, he is not exactly the poster boy for Northern hospitality.
The local police therefore take every opportunity to knock some manners into the pesky busybody and, in the end, literally beat the shit out of him. Yet, despite being on the wrong end of the mother of all brutality, Edward still manages to dust himself off and go on a rampage for justice that makes Buford Pusser look like the Dalai Lama.
Who would no doubt advise Edward, “Be kind whenever possible; it is always possible.” To which Edward would no doubt reply, “The Dalai fucking Lama.”
**½
Monday, 25 November 2019
METROPOLIS Philip Kerr. Review
Berlin, 1927. The Weimar Republic is in the middle of its so-called Golden Era, though you’d never know it if you walked a kilometer in Detective Bernie Gunther’s shoes. Purges of Jews, Communists and other undesirables would not begin for another six years, but someone is already beta-testing the Nazi social contract by targeting prostitutes and homeless WWI veterans, deemed embarrassing reminders of Germany’s defeat and decline since 1918. New to the police department’s murder squad, Gunther can suffer the slings and arrows of standard procedure only so long before he hits on the idea of going undercover as a homeless veteran himself. Along the way, he enters the seedy world of Cabaret and rubs elbows with the brightest artistic lights of the day, including Fritz Lang (director of the 1927 film classic that gives the book its name), his collaborator/wife Thea Von Harbou and the artists George Grosz and Otto Dix (who actually did paint homeless, disfigured veterans on Berlin’s straßes).
Although it’s been awhile since I’ve read the first three of the eight Bernie Gunther books, my memories of them are fonder than those of Metropolis. In the early books, the interweaving of historic figures with fictional narrative seemed seamless. Metropolis , on the other hand, reads as two books: a bog-standard police procedural; and a non-fiction description of a year in the life of the Weimar Republic. With the notable exceptions of Bernie’s day-to-day meetings with Bernhard Weiss, Berlin’s real-life Chief of Police, and Ernst Gennat, a legendary homicide detective, the intersection of fiction and historic figures/events too often feels forced. Descriptions of real people and places read like encyclopedia entries, while the 21-page (in Kindle) summing up of events by the gangster Erich Angerstein is more newspaper account than storytelling.
That is not to say that Metropolis is not a good read. There are more than a few passages that give Raymond Chandler a run for his money. “My brain felt like a half lemon in a bartender’s fist.” “A naval- style black cap with a shiny peak that probably resembled his soul.” “One of his ears reminded me of an unborn fetus.” It’s just a shame there wasn’t more Chandler and less Wikipedia.
Three stars
Tuesday, 17 September 2019
AUSTRAVAGANZA-THE NO TREPIDATION TOUR
THE NO TREPIDATION TOUR
THE CREW
ERIC,TOM & MALCOLM
JOE & ECKART
ALASTAIR &TOM
CREATURE FROM THE LAGOON-BLED
And the a slide down. 22 seconds or thereabouts.
SLIP SLIDING
Then after a quick stop for a beer, another 3k or so hike to a restaurant (see FOOD). And then another post-lunch and scrumpy 6k hike back to the villas.
LUNCH AT THE FARM
DAY TWO
ARMAMENTS TURNED LIGHT FIXTURE
Each gatehouse has a bas relief of the Stations of the Cross. Apparently no invader made it past the fourth gatehouse since the 1600s. And if they did, this is what would await them.
Do you know what the difference between beer and piss is? Five minutes.
THE UNENDING ATTRACTION OF NATURE COMES TO LIFE
A SALUTARY WARNING TO CLIMATE CHANGE
ALL FROM THE SAME FARM
And if the meat was not enough, how about some cheese.
And for variety this was for breakfast….the sausage on the right is a meat cheese combo…yep, you read it right…a meat cheese combo.
A VERITABLE SCHLAGFEST
TRANSLATION:MEN HAVE FEELINGS TOO. THIRST, FOR EXAMPLE
THANKS, JAMES, FOR A TRULY MEMORABLE THREE DAYS!
Tuesday, 16 July 2019
MUSINGS ON THE CRICKET AND WIMBLEDON
Wednesday, 29 May 2019
REVIEW OF HOPE:A TRAGEDY Joe Igoe
Hope- A Tragedy
Shalom Auslander
Enough already ! Very funny, but just a bit over the top at times.
I laughed out loud- always a good thing to do on the tube – in several parts, but at the end of the day I thought the booksomewhat outdone by its cleverness.
There were some decidedly innovative – and negative-explorations of philosophy, after all who would have imagined that Hitler was the greatest optimist of the 20thcentury ! In a way this book is an exploration of Angst. Angst as a Leitmotiv, unfounded (?) paranoia as the consequence.
The book also has some very good bits of social commentary.
Very clever dialogue particularly on Anne Frank’s part when you thought she was more or less just a comic figure (that in itself is an achievement). I also found the real estate agent’s rant quite memorable, but…..enough already.
Stereotypes abound in this book and if, unlike me, you didn’t grow up on Long Island or somewhere else with a decent whiff of Jewish culture and humour, you may have not gotten all the references and schtick.
Kugel is a nice guy, Woody Allen would love him (I’m sure he’s read the book- wait for the film). Nice guys, however, according to the legendary Dodgers manager Leo Durocher, finish last and this is exactly what happens to our hero. God bless him.
I liked this book, but would have liked it better if it had been a bit shorter and perhaps better edited. It is funny, hilariously so in places, but also overegged in other places. In a way like a joke that is a bit overlong. Nonetheless the viewpoint and humour were very clever.
Three. Five out of five, just because I’m from Long Island.
Thursday, 16 May 2019
REVIEW OF A GENTLEMAN IN MOSCOW
A Gentleman in Moscow
Reviewed by Joe Igoe
A very touching, well detailed account of a man exiled to the microcosm of Moscow’s finest hotel. A man of surprising experience, intelligence and resourcefulness living in a time and place where his origins- and the origins of his self- have been repudiated, outlawed and often executed.
It is a fairy tale and an engaging one at that. In a way reminiscent of The Avengers in that the main protagonist is incredibly erudite, experienced and cultured. In a way reminiscent of The Princess Bride in that all the pieces and people come together just so to let the good triumph over the bad and banal. Discrepancies are conveniently glossed over.
While not sacrificing too much to realism, there are elements of the outside world which are allowed to creep in. Allusions are made to the upheavals of the Russian revolution and the depredations of Stalin as well as the effects of these events on people. But, somehow, our hero survives and ultimately prevails – with the help of his inexhaustible supply of luck, sophistication, knowledge and money. He is additionally very sympathetic. His kindness and ability to connect with people of all sorts and sizes is what makes him appealing as a character. He also manages to positively affect all deserving souls who meet him as well as outwitting those of a more sinister nature.
The strength of the book is its well-constructed narrative combining events in the hotel, the Soviet Union outside and the insular world of the hotel. Glimpses of man’s ability to survive, innovate and, at least to a certain extent, prosper in difficult circumstances with kindness and humour are plentiful. Even the ostensible bad guys, or at least one of them, is allowed a sense of humour and sympathy in his interactions with Alexander, his intervention to save Nadia and his instructions to “round up the usual suspects”.
In the final analysis this “Harry Potter” of a Russian tale is very enjoyable, finely crafted and with a fine bit of Menschlichkeit or humanity. It’s not “One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich”, but doesn’t purport to be. I found it to be a thoroughly enjoyable book to read.